Thread: Suit against BN?

I was thinking, if we follow the sentence 'attack is the best selfdefence' then does it have a sense to start legal suit against BN??

Need your opinions?

Chill.

What reason would you have for suing an investigating body, that they are taking to long.

For what? He Hasn't been found guilty of anything except trying to make YOU, and I financially secure . So it Backfired because of ,Greedy People, Trolls, and a Bu--sh-- Investigation which has led nowhere except to allienate a great group of PIPSTERS against each other. Things like this are Just more antagonizem, and disent trown into the already brewwing Pot of Crap against PIPS.

Originally Posted by bob1940

For what? He Hasn't been found guilty of anything except trying to make YOU, and I financially secure . So it Backfired because of ,Greedy People, Trolls, and a Bu--sh-- Investigation which has led nowhere except to allienate a great group of PIPSTERS against each other. Things like this are Just more antagonizem, and disent trown into the already brewwing Pot of Crap against PIPS.

He said sue BN not BM. Im sure there will be alot of lawsuits against BM eventually.

Ok i missread that post. but still what are we suing for?

its early in the morn for me and my eyes are failing me i guess.

Originally Posted by trale

I was thinking, if we follow the sentence 'attack is the best selfdefence' then does it have a sense to start legal suit against BN??

Need your opinions?

You need legal "standing" to sue. It would be a total waste of $$. investigative bodies can take as long as they like to do their work, no matter how unfair it is.

If you don't want to get stung, don't throw stones at the hive!

theBat$ says why make the bees angry? For honey?

Originally Posted by trale

I was thinking, if we follow the sentence 'attack is the best selfdefence' then does it have a sense to start legal suit against BN??

Need your opinions?

Do you know what you're talking about?