From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
AT WEBSITE IT HAS ALL THE COUNRTY ON LIST
The World Trade Organization currently has 146 member states, plus four more entities (EU, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan). 2 states have completed negotiations (2 Oceania). 27 states are in negotiations (7 Africa, 1 America, 9 Asia, 9 Europe, 1 Oceania). One state has observer status (1 Africa). One state is a permanent special observer (1 Europe). 16 states have no relationship to the WTrO (4 Africa, 4 Asia, 2 Europe, 6 Oceania).
The process is as follows: memorandum on foreign trade regime, bilateral market access negotiations, drafting of terms of accession.
Contents
Negotiations completeNegotiations almost complete (to join soon) In negotiations
- Tonga — will join in 2007[1]
- Vanuatu — last activity 29 October 2001, currently considering whether to join
Negotiations to begin soon
- Tajikistan — last activity 11 April 2005
- Iraq — last activity 13 December 2004
- Afghanistan — last activity 13 December 2004
- Iran — last activity 26 May 2005
Please visit our sponsors
Results 451 to 460 of 735
-
27-02-2007, 04:10 AM #451
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 2
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 1
- Thanked 31 Times in 2 Posts
Last edited by JJADEMATT; 27-02-2007 at 02:55 PM.
-
The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to JJADEMATT For This Useful Post:
-
27-02-2007, 04:21 AM #452
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 2,027
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 2,505
- Thanked 6,689 Times in 421 Posts
Maybe because the 1282 is still close enough to the dollar/Euro pairing ($1.28)
that the CBI does not want to go higher as they are just waiting for GOI to complete HCL and announce? Perhaps being so close to an RV at this time all confusion will be lost anyway when real rate is known hopefully in a few days?
JMHO
-
The Following 30 Users Say Thank You to Mike5200 For This Useful Post:
barngramp, chouchou, christiankat, dinarminar, dinartank, funwit, goldraker, Hardwood, Hkp, Icemann 30, jabber9, jhook, JoeDinar, junkman, lewscrew, Loki, lucky duck, mtgrown, neno, newadv23, notazbad2000, oliverp, OmaRich, sallyl, silver, teshema, watching, wciappetta, Wildfire, Zimi31
-
27-02-2007, 05:02 AM #453
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Arizona
- Posts
- 2
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 29 Times in 1 Post
From the WSJ
Iraq Cabinet Backs Oil Proposal
By HASSAN HAFIDH in Amman, Jordan, and CHIP CUMMINS in London
February 26, 2007 9:37 p.m.
Iraq's cabinet approved a draft law laying the groundwork for oil-field development contracts, a move that eventually could lift its battered economy and help allay the country's sectarian divisions.
The legislation now goes to parliament. If the law is approved, it would green-light negotiations between central-government and regional officials and foreign oil-company executives, though oil companies aren't likely to rush into the country anytime soon.
FIGHT FOR IRAQ
See continuing coverage of developments in Iraq, including an interactive map of day-to-day events in Iraq and a tally of military deaths.
The legislation would provide foreign executives with a legal foundation for any oil-field development contracts they may one day sign with government officials. The lack of such a framework after Saddam Hussein's ouster in 2003 has prevented most oil companies from entering into detailed negotiations.
Typically, in countries with nationalized oil industries, foreign oil companies negotiate a contract with the government itself. That was the case in Iraq before Mr. Hussein's fall. The new law would clear the way for oil companies to negotiate with Iraq's current central government, along with the regional authorities.
Iraq is home to some of the world's largest crude-oil deposits, and much of the country remains relatively unexplored. Decades of war and underinvestment have left the oil industry in shambles. U.S. officials have long encouraged Iraqi counterparts to hammer out a petroleum law in the hopes of encouraging foreign investment and jump starting Iraq's economy.
A petroleum law could also provide some relief from the political fighting by holding out the promise of new revenue streams.
WSJ.com - Login
-
The Following 29 Users Say Thank You to SunDevil For This Useful Post:
-
27-02-2007, 05:28 AM #454
Just some quick math and an example of why they must revalue the dinar...
Lets assume that Iraq has 15 Trillion dinar in circulation
15,000,000,000,000
divided by
1282
at the current rate that comes to approximately $11,700,468,018 USDs
now if we divide 11.7 billion by the number of Iraqis, 26 million, we will find that there is enough currency at the current rate for each person to have about $450.00 USD.
This does not take into account the dinar removed from circulation through the auctions or the dinar needed for Government expenditures.
-
The Following 27 Users Say Thank You to lndmn_01 For This Useful Post:
-
27-02-2007, 05:39 AM #455
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Posts
- 5,906
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 3,000
- Thanked 5,808 Times in 483 Posts
Finish the Math. Now Minus
That 11.7 trill by at least 5 trill taken out = roughly 6.7 trill. Pretty slim if you ask me.
-
-
27-02-2007, 05:46 AM #456
-
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to lndmn_01 For This Useful Post:
-
27-02-2007, 06:48 AM #457
Me thinks none of us know where the queen is in this game of Three-card Monte!!!
Three-card Monte - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
-
-
27-02-2007, 07:00 AM #458
-
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to dinartank For This Useful Post:
-
27-02-2007, 07:02 AM #459
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- usa
- Posts
- 172
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 136
- Thanked 154 Times in 20 Posts
also-- " Because the new Iraqi dinar was so popular, the central bank bought billions of U.S. dollars to keep it from appreciating too much ".
With dinars ? Any guess on how many trillions the US treasury holds ?Last edited by bigred52; 27-02-2007 at 03:15 PM.
-
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to bigred52 For This Useful Post:
-
27-02-2007, 07:47 AM #460
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Posts
- 60
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 28
- Thanked 68 Times in 3 Posts
May ----- or perhaps Mar(ch)
When I look at some of the translated news, calling it gibberish might perhaps denigrate the word 'gibberish'. Bearing that in mind, would it be a stretch to consider that the 'May' that was cited could actually be 'Mar'? That would certainly dovetail with much of the other information that's out there right now. May is 'no fit'; Mar is a 'fit'.
-
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to nventr For This Useful Post:
-
Sponsored Links
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
24 Hour Gold
Advertising
- Over 20.000 UNIQUE Daily!
- Get Maximum Exposure For Your Site!
- Get QUALITY Converting Traffic!
- Advertise Here Today!
Out Of Billions Of Website's Online.
Members Are Online From.
- Get Maximum Exposure For Your Site!
- Get QUALITY Converting Traffic!
- Advertise Here Today!
Out Of Billions Of Website's Online.
Members Are Online From.