Thread: Iraq/Dinar News. 09/05 to 01/14/07

Quote: Posted by sgs,
Three projects for the territories before the Iraqi Parliament today

(Voice of Iraq) - 10-10-2006


Three projects for the territories before the Iraqi Parliament today
Iraqi Vice expected to witness a meeting of the Iraqi parliament today, the drafts of the new law Territories controversial, after the 1609/86 decision of the Constitutional Court, the concurrent operation of sections 118 and 142 of the primacy of one without the other.
She said another Hashemite speaking from the list of the United Iraqi Alliance that today's meeting will put three drafts of the law of the provinces, It went on to "Public Opinion», said that the parliament will vote on one of the projects submitted by the parties on the issue of federalism to choose the most suitable and appropriate for all spectra of the people. She explained that there is three drafts submitted by each of the Rules of the United Iraqi Alliance and the Iraqi List and Iraqi Accord Front », However, they did not reveal any details about any of the three projects. She pointed out that the three projects will be presented to members of Parliament and then vote on them to get approval. She expressed fears of the Hashemite out that the presence of members of the political blocs objecting to the law of the meeting, which will lead to the postponement of the meeting because of lack of quorum ».
But Sheikh Hamid burdensome, the leading member, on the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq », he said it was not true sense draft, but the drafts and proposals ». He added that he would be reading drafts "the form of the first and second opinion, and therefore will be voting», the draft is expected to receive that are not inconsistent with the terms of the Constitution the consent of Deputies.
The deputy said Karim Mohsen have deployed, the leading member of the Virtue Party, The draft law submitted by the Non Virtue of the Parliament that would resolve the dispute between the demands of the Federation is rejected. He continued : "I included the composition of the territory of our province and one module, and preserve the territorial powers, At the same time retain its population and administrative unity of the same province. »

Public opinion


Ok that's it I'm fixing to start protesting all their postponments LOL

Originally Posted by postcon

Taking this straight off AD site, which was posted by Checkm8t

"Why does everyone think an RV goes hand-in-hand with the FIL being signed/implemented? The argument is that without an RV, Iraq can be bought out for pennies. A person who I personally know, who has a VERY strong background in economics, says that Iraq can be protected with verbage in the FIL, and an RV ins't necessary. It's called economic protectionism. I have a feeling there are gonna be lots of disapointed folks when an RV doesn't happen when (if) the FIL is signed this week."

Maybe someone clued up could answer this one perhaps?

We'll I'll say this, I'm not in any way educated on this information, but I do know that Iraq cannot continue to keep functioning at the rate the dinar is now, NO country would of invested in them if they didn't believe that there was coming a RV, So with a background in econmics maybe he can explain how iraq will keep functioning at the rate the dinar is now.

Originally Posted by postcon

Taking this straight off AD site, which was posted by Checkm8t

"Why does everyone think an RV goes hand-in-hand with the FIL being signed/implemented? The argument is that without an RV, Iraq can be bought out for pennies. A person who I personally know, who has a VERY strong background in economics, says that Iraq can be protected with verbage in the FIL, and an RV ins't necessary. It's called economic protectionism. I have a feeling there are gonna be lots of disapointed folks when an RV doesn't happen when (if) the FIL is signed this week."

Maybe someone clued up could answer this one perhaps?

i dont know what that cat is smokin but he hasnt been reading about iraq for two years non-stop.

Man I just missed it, I had my volume turned down on the TV and right when I turned it up I heard on CNBC World live they were talking about Bush and Iraq. If someone could maybe get it on their computor a rerun of it.

Originally Posted by day dreamer

We'll I'll say this, I'm not in any way educated on this information, but I do know that Iraq cannot continue to keep functioning at the rate the dinar is now, NO country would of invested in them if they didn't believe that there was coming a RV, So with a background in econmics maybe he can explain how iraq will keep functioning at the rate the dinar is now.

Thanks for the response. But isn't economic protectionism what China practises to great effect? It doesn't seem to have impeded their progress on the global front. Please bear in mind that I am just looking for answers to help my understanding and am not trying to put a dampener on events and hopes!

Originally Posted by postcon

Thanks for the response. But isn't economic protectionism what China practises to great effect? It doesn't seem to have impeded their progress on the global front. Please bear in mind that I am just looking for answers to help my understanding and am not trying to put a dampener on events and hopes!

Like I said I have no background in economics so I guess I can't help you. Sorry

Originally Posted by postcon

Thanks for the response. But isn't economic protectionism what China practises to great effect? It doesn't seem to have impeded their progress on the global front. Please bear in mind that I am just looking for answers to help my understanding and am not trying to put a dampener on events and hopes!

at least there value is .08

Originally Posted by CORY

at least there value is .08

Yes, quite. But surely the argument that a country could be bought out for pennies is baseless considering laws within the country will have restricitions on foreign investment.

Thanks so far to those who have responded.

Originally Posted by shotgunsusie

someone scholarly? said to the parliament when they mentioned putting off the vote until thursday the 12th that it was some tradition in ramadan to have things completed by the 10th of the month of ramadan by ten after ten. the article is in thread 4 i think.

According to a calendar I got from a friend in Malaysia, Ramadan 10th is/was October 3rd.

Sources suggest postponing the date of the convening of a conference of political forces
(Voice of Iraq) - 10-10-2006

Sources suggest postponing the date of the convening of a conference of political forces

The government allocated (150) million for the success of the reconciliation
Baghdad morning
Sources in the national reconciliation postpone the date of the convening of a conference of parties and political forces to be held on the 21st of this month in order to delay the necessary preparations. He said one of the members of the Board, who requested anonymity, told "Sabah"
That body has not met since three weeks have not so far invited any party or political movement. noting that it is supposed to be sent three delegations to Amman, Cairo and Dubai to invite movements and political figures adopts the principle of opposition exists in those capitals, it has not been any delegation travel so far. He added that "the government has allocated 150 million dollars" for the success of the initiative of national reconciliation but it is not exchange any money from the members of the Commission did not receive payments or rewards. noting that the reconciliation asked more than once to allocate rooms for meetings, it has not been so far none of this. He went on to say that the next few days would witness a meeting of the body attended by the President of the Republic mostly Jalal Talabani and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, He emphasized that the members of the Commission are currently involved in the conference because of the postponement is not in the interest of reconciliation initiative announced by Maliki before the 100th day.

Sotaliraq.com