Thread: Iraq/Dinar News. 09/05 to 01/14/07

Originally Posted by texaslonghorns

Can someboy give the high points of what was discussed on the FreeDinar call tonight? Thanks!

The "Free Dinar" call really didn't have all that much info on it. They think that it will RV sometime between the 10th and the 15th of November. They think that on monday there will be a big announcement from GW about how good Iraq is doing with the FIL being announced,and the Compact being signed and all of the other positive things that are going on over there.

Originally Posted by Frank Rizzo

It could get you a happy meal at the local McDonalds in downtown Fallujah...

you mean burger king there isnt a macdonalds in fallujah

Every time I came to the board today, I have seen several posts about who is watching the board. Folks we are a public board, anyone can view our posts. With our investment here we use "key words" all the time that will make several governmental agency's take notice. But we are all above board and there is no reason to get upset and worry about who is watching. This is a legal investment and we just search and discuss what is happening.

So let's all be aware that yes we are being watched, but so what? That is just a part of life.

Now back to the dinar!

Originally Posted by texaslonghorns

Can someboy give the high points of what was discussed on the FreeDinar call tonight? Thanks!

Well I caught the call tonite & it sounds like there still not selling Dinar& they feel that all the signs are there for reval & Nov. 15th is his personal prediction. Does he win the prize if he gets it right They say the BOA will start selling on 11/13 The 10k to citizens next week. Shabbi MOF says the reval be qiuick without any warning it will just happen fast when it does . They need all the good news they can to get high reval. Personally this hype is wearing me out every week or hot peice of news & trillions of Dollars are going to appear to pay a bunch of hopeful investors with tunnel-vision. I agree that it looks as good as it ever has . Except the highst death toll ever for one month. Don't they relieze how good it could be for them. Its not even Iraqi's completely there is a high percentage of terrorist from other places getting in on the fight.IMO Don't they know that is the garden spot of the Middle East. Wasn't Bethlaham near Bagdag? Enough of my amauture attempt of wisdom. BADBOY

Originally Posted by AlwaysDreaming

Most I ordered was 3 million at one time...no problem at Chase in Goodyear

I ordered mine here in round rock texas. Was the first time using them. I use to buy from dealers. Anyway, I wonder why they put the 1000.00 USD cap for me?

Originally Posted by badboy

Well I caught the call tonite & it sounds like there still not selling Dinar& they feel that all the signs are there for reval & Nov. 15th is his personal prediction. Does he win the prize if he gets it right They say the BOA will start selling on 11/13 The 10k to citizens next week. Shabbi MOF says the reval be qiuick without any warning it will just happen fast when it does . They need all the good news they can to get high reval. Personally this hype is wearing me out every week or hot peice of news & trillions of Dollars are going to appear to pay a bunch of hopeful investors with tunnel-vision. I agree that it looks as good as it ever has . Except the highst death toll ever for one month. Don't they relieze how good it could be for them. Its not even Iraqi's completely there is a high percentage of terrorist from other places getting in on the fight.IMO Don't they know that is the garden spot of the Middle East. Wasn't Bethlaham near Bagdag? Enough of my amauture attempt of wisdom. BADBOY

Even with all the problems in Iraqi right now the postive signs are all there. You have to keep your spirits up, it is going to happen and should be soon.

Babaloyn is the city you were thinking of it is 60 miles or clicks (never can get those figured out) south of Bagdad.

Originally Posted by MOM2TWO

wait what?? huh? Sorry, to be the big doofus here, but I have no idea what that means....someone help?????

Sorry, perhaps I was a little too succinct! Don't feel foolish - how many people normally read legislation??

A Statute or Act is a (relatively) general thing designed to define a law and it's purpose, who is to enforce it, and some specifics of how it should work.

The "regulations" (Canada), which they seem to be calling "instructions" in Iraq break it down further and get very specific about how it is to be administered, how the group who administer it is formed, and even what forms they will use (business forms like applicaton forms, etc.).

Here is the basic part of a Municpal Act which tells how the municipalities should be governed:

Government of municipality

10 (1) A municipality is governed by a council consisting of at least three members.

(2) One councillor shall be elected for each polling district in a county or district municipality and in a regional municipality.

(3) No more than two councillors shall be elected for each polling district in a town. 1998, c. 18, s. 10; 2000, c. 9, s. 33.

Here is one little piece of the one of the regulations about it:

made under Section 388A of the
Municipal Government Act
S.N.S. 1998, c. 18
N.S. Reg. 2/2003 (January 14, 2003)
For the purposes of subsection 388A(2) of the Municipal Government Act, the returning officer shall register only one group of electors in favour of and one group of electors opposed to the question and any decisions respecting the registration of groups shall be at the sole discretion of the returning officer.

It goes on to show the form for them to use to register the group.

I hope this helps!

Originally Posted by badboy

Shabbi MOF says the reval be qiuick without any warning it will just happen fast when it does . :

What when was this said..

With all the news we have been diggin up lately I still think it will be before the elections on Tues. Several months back when I was a regular posting on the doom and gloom site...I took a lot of heat when I said don't be surprised if it revals on a Friday...I know it is their holy day but it would be least expectded. Anyway I really do not see it going more than a few days longer at the most...way too much info is surfacing. As far as rumors about the 11/13 and BOA, they may very well start dealing on the 13th but that is not an indicator that it will hit on the 13th. Think about it...would you want to be brokering a new currency the same day it hits the market if you were not previously familiar with and already dealing in that currency. If not already dealing hands-on with the currency it would be smart to wait a few days to let the initial "bugs" get worked out and let competitor banks make the mistakes which at a high reval could amount to a tidy sum...and I will use a phrase commonly used by our brave, highly respected and intelligent military and of course my Army husband that says it all....sounds like a "BIG CLUSTER-F**K in the making". That of course is his opinion of the BOA 11/13 rumor if it revals on 11/13...now it could reval now or in a day or 2 and then BOA start dealing which would be reasonable, highly doubt both occur on the same day i.e. a reval and BOA dealing publicly.

David Ignatius - Seeking Options On Iraq - washingtonpost.com




Seeking Options On Iraq

By David Ignatius
Friday, November 3, 2006; Page A21

Following Tuesday's elections, President Bush will face some of the most difficult decisions of his presidency as he struggles to craft a strategy for dealing with the ruinous mess in Iraq. He will have to do what he has sometimes found hardest: make a decisive choice among conflicting recommendations from his advisers.

The coming policy debate will be shaped by the recommendations of the bipartisan Iraq Study Group headed by former secretary of state James A. Baker III and former representative Lee Hamilton. But it will also involve basic conflicts that have emerged in the past year over Middle East strategy -- for which the rough Beltway shorthand would be Condoleezza Rice's State Department vs. the office of Vice President Cheney.

Staying the Course
» Robert Kagan Many in the world would welcome a Republican defeat next week. But they shouldn't expect it to change U.S. policy or America's belief in the value of military action.

* Puhl and Brownell: Wrong Way to Fight Fat
* David S. Broder: Behind the Gridlock
* PostGlobal: Allow Gay Marriage

OPINIONS SECTION: Editorials, Toles
Save & Share Article What's This?
Digg
Google

del.icio.us
Yahoo!

Reddit
Facebook

The central question for Bush is the one that's likely to be at the center of the Baker-Hamilton recommendations: Is America's best hope for stabilizing Iraq a broad effort to resolve tensions in the Middle East, including the Arab-Israeli dispute? This comprehensive regional approach to Iraq is controversial for two reasons: The United States would have to engage Iraq's troublesome neighbors, Iran and Syria; and it would have to push Israel to make concessions to the Palestinians as part of a broader peace deal.

A hint that the administration (or at least a faction of it) is considering such an approach came in a Sept. 15 speech by Philip Zelikow, counselor to Rice, at a gathering of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. He talked about the need to maintain a coalition of Europeans and moderate Arabs to solve problems such as Iraq and Iran, and then argued: "What would bind that coalition and help keep them together is a sense that the Arab-Israeli issues are being addressed." His speech led Shmuel Rosner, the chief U.S. correspondent for the Israeli daily Haaretz, to wonder in his blog: "Does it really mean a major shift in U.S. policy on the Arab-Israeli conflict?"

Baker would be an ideal catalyst for such a regional approach, in part because he traveled that road once before with the 1991 Madrid peace conference. That meeting brought together all the major global and regional powers to support a round of peacemaking that led to a treaty between Israel and Jordan, negotiations between Israel and the Syrians, and, eventually, the Oslo accords between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization. To begin exploring the possibility of a new regional dialogue, Baker has already met privately with Iranian and Syrian diplomats.

Some hard-liners are nervous about Baker. A National Security Council staffer commented tartly a few weeks ago that Baker isn't secretary of state and doesn't speak for Bush. And the president himself, though he admires Baker's negotiating skills, worries that an overeager former secretary of state might hop on a plane for Tehran tomorrow if he had his way.

Britain has been testing the waters for a regional approach. Sir Nigel Sheinwald, the top foreign policy adviser to Prime Minister Tony Blair, visited Damascus this week for talks with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his intelligence chiefs. Sheinwald had visited Washington a week before to plan the trip with senior administration officials who, though skeptical about whether the mission would accomplish much, gave it their blessing.

Sheinwald presented a series of British-U.S. concerns, including Syria's role in providing a base for Iraqi insurgents and recent Syrian threats to destabilize the Lebanese government of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora. Though the meeting didn't produce any breakthroughs, the atmospherics were said to have been better than expected, and there are hopes for further discussions about security issues.

Administration officials are mum about plans for contacts with Iran. But it's clear they are looking for ways to engage the Iranian regime and explore issues of mutual concern, starting with the deteriorating situation in Baghdad.

The hornet's nest at the center of the Middle East is Iraq. On this core issue, the administration is exploring a wide range of options, from changes in basic military strategy to whom to pick as the next Centcom commander. The administration had hoped to persuade Marine Gen. James Jones, the retiring NATO commander, to take the job. He would be a popular choice inside and outside the military, but he is said to be wary.

Israelis are watching the Washington policy debate carefully. There is concern that the administration might try to make Israel the "fall guy" for America's problems with Iraq and Iran. But several of the Israelis who are closest to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert say privately that the current power vacuum in the region hurts Israel most of all and that America must regain the strategic momentum, even if that means talking to its adversaries. Stay tuned to see if Bush opts for a "November surprise."

The writer co-hosts, with Newsweek's Fareed Zakaria, PostGlobal, an online discussion of international issues athttp://blog.washingtonpost.com/postglobal. His e-mail address [email protected].