what kind of returns can you get on bonds with the " BEST " bond guys?Well, I have some thoughts on both of the above posts. I have been a Financial Planner for a number of years and handle many millions in clients investments. A Good Fin. Planner will want to know your goals, your tax situation and all other assets that are out there. You want all of your money going in the direction that is best for all your goals and that's hard to do with you split it 5 ways. If a person has many millions (as many on here will) they will need a couple of good Bond guys, others for tax efficient investments and others for growth that isn't going to create too much capital gains in any one particular year. So, when you say the ones who Perform the best - in which manner? The Bond guys may perform beautifully for certain tax situations, but if you compare them to growth performances, they would fall to the bottom.
There are some really good Private Banking companies out there than handle millions. They have a Group of financial professionals that all work together on your particular needs. I have approached a Private Banking division and will probably go with them when the time comes.
So, comparing several planners really isn't a very fair way to go, for you or for them. If you want to "play around" with some bucks and pass it out there for performance, that is one thing, but when we all have many millions, go to a Group of professionals. I may go to two groups of professionals and I also have contacts with two of the best Bond guys in the U.S.
Wanted to pass along another view points.
Please visit our sponsors
Results 30,231 to 30,240 of 37617
-
06-12-2006, 04:32 AM #30231
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 271
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 1
- Thanked 176 Times in 24 Posts
-
06-12-2006, 04:33 AM #30232
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- FREEDOMLAND
- Posts
- 3,277
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 574
- Thanked 2,129 Times in 355 Posts
Iraqi Investments Club
Good question,
What I would think would happen is a ripple effect based on how closely tied the other currencies were to dollar, so I would not be comfortable with any currencies if dollar takes a big hit all at once. Better off with silver and gold in my opinion as these will quickly rise in the panic of dollar decline, so all we can do is watch closely and be prepared, but I will be hanging onto my dinar waiting for the dust to settle. Middle east currencies would be the most safe in my estimation, so take your pick, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar would be good choices as well. India, China, Viet Nam and Russia currencies would work, and of course, Swiss is always pretty stable. (g)
Good luck to all, Mike
-
06-12-2006, 04:34 AM #30233
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Colorado
- Posts
- 570
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 44 Times in 5 Posts
-
06-12-2006, 04:37 AM #30234
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Dominion Republic of Alberta
- Posts
- 39
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 22
- Thanked 48 Times in 4 Posts
Hydrocarbon Law
Hey Gang did the HCL ever get passed into law? ...Can't remember what happened to it
-
06-12-2006, 04:41 AM #30235
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Posts
- 5,906
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 3,000
- Thanked 5,808 Times in 483 Posts
-
06-12-2006, 04:49 AM #30236
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 585
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 648
- Thanked 1,659 Times in 108 Posts
Well Troops, its been an Intersesting day here on the News thread. I much appreciate your contributions. Learned about reserves in the US concernining dinar reserves. Dinars bought to reduice outstanting curenncy. and who dislikes who.... Your a great bunch of people...
Looking forward to tomorrow.. Good night all, may visions of $1.68 dance in your head.
By the way Adster, since your still single........
Gloribee
-
06-12-2006, 05:25 AM #30237
-
06-12-2006, 05:39 AM #30238
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Dominion Republic of Alberta
- Posts
- 39
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 22
- Thanked 48 Times in 4 Posts
-
06-12-2006, 06:23 AM #30239
-
06-12-2006, 06:31 AM #30240
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 220
- Feedback Score
- 0
- Thanks
- 149
- Thanked 374 Times in 57 Posts
In this photo released by the Iraqi Prime Minister Press Office, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki holds a ...
Al-Maliki to Call for Regional Meeting
By QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA
2 hours ago
BAGHDAD, Iraq - Iraq's prime minister reversed course Tuesday and said his envoys will talk with Iraq's neighbors about the possibility of a regional conference on quelling the violence here, despite opposition to the plan by some key political allies.
Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki made the announcement as more than 100 people were killed or found dead in and around Baghdad, underscoring the urgency of finding a solution to the bloodshed.
The U.S. military said three more American troops had died Monday _ two as a result of insurgent attacks and one in a traffic accident.
Despite a string of ambushes, mortar attacks and bombings Tuesday, the chief U.S. military spokesman told reporters that all of Iraq would be under Baghdad's control by the fall of 2007, with U.S. soldiers and Marines and other coalition forces playing a supporting role.
Al-Maliki, a Shiite, told reporters that his envoys would talk with other governments in the region, most of them Sunni-dominated, about how they might help establish security and stability in Iraq.
"After the political climate is cleared, we will call for the convening of a regional conference in which these countries that are keen on the stability and security of Iraq will participate," al-Maliki said.
The prime minister's statement fell short of an unconditional call for a conference. Previously, Iraqi leaders have resisted suggestions they include outsiders in efforts to settle their bitter internal divisions.
In recent days, President Jalal Talabani and a leading Shiite politician, Abdul-Aziz al-Hakim, have rejected U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan's proposal for a regional peace conference. Annan said such a gathering could be useful if the parties met outside Iraq.
Al-Maliki, though, said any conference should take place in Iraq. Any proposals to emerge, he added, should conform to "what the national unity government wants."
The Bush administration welcomed the announcement. "It's a good idea for the Iraqis to be involved in working with their neighbors on issues of regional security," said White House spokesman Tony Snow.
At al-Maliki's press conference in Baghdad, the Iraqi leader said a frequently delayed national reconciliation conference would convene this month. He also said he planned to reshuffle his six-month-old Cabinet, to increase its "effectiveness and strength," but offered no further details.
Al-Maliki's hedged endorsement of a regional peace conference came one day before the bipartisan Iraq Study Group, co-chaired by former Secretary of State James A. Baker III, is to release recommendations on changing U.S. strategy in Iraq.
The group is expected to suggest that Iraq's neighbors, including longtime U.S. adversaries Iran and Syria, be invited to help in the search for an end to the violence. Al-Maliki did not say whether his envoys would visit those countries.
Al-Maliki was careful not to commit himself unequivocally to a regional conference, perhaps due to opposition to the proposal among his allies.
But the prime minister may feel he cannot reject such a call outright. Instead, his conditions appeared aimed at limiting the scope of the conference, raising the possibility it may not take place soon.
Arab countries like Egypt generally favor such a conference, in part because they increasingly fear the rise of Shiite power in Iraq and the possible growing influence of predominantly Shiite Iran.
But Iraq's Shiites, who dominate the government, fear Sunni-dominated countries will pressure Baghdad to make concessions to Iraq's Sunni Arab minority, which launched the insurgency against the U.S.-led coalition three years ago.
At any regional peace conference, both Iran and Syria would most likely try to increase their influence in Iraq.
The U.S. maintains about 140,000 troops in Iraq and is considering changing its strategic course in the country.
Robert Gates, the White House choice to be the next defense secretary, conceded during his Senate confirmation hearing Tuesday that the United States is not winning the war in Iraq. If the country is not stabilized in the next year or two, he warned, it could lead to a "regional conflagration."
He later said he believes the U.S. is neither winning nor losing, "at this point."
U.S. military spokesman Maj. Gen. William Caldwell told reporters that efforts to transfer security responsibility to the Iraqi military were moving forward. He predicted the entire country would be under the control of Iraqi police and military by the fall of next year.
"We would expect to see the entire country having reached provincial Iraqi control by early fall of next year," Caldwell said. "We should see the complete transfer of command and control of all Iraqi army divisions by late spring, early summer."
The planned transfer of authority, he said, was part of an accelerated timetable discussed by President Bush and al-Maliki last week in Jordan.
Meanwhile, violence persisted unabated.
Suspected Sunni extremists killed 15 Shiite government workers in an attack on their minibus in Baghdad, the government said. Gunmen halted the vehicle and executed several passengers, who were on their way to work at the Shiite Endowment, a government ministry that acts as caretaker for Shiite mosques.
Fifteen other people were killed near a gasoline station when two car bombs exploded in the capital, police said. And at least 15 died in shootings, bombings and a mortar attack in and around Baghdad. Four bodies were pulled from the Tigris River south of the capital.
Police discovered the tortured bodies of 60 people who had been bound, blindfolded, then shot and left in Baghdad over the past 24 hours, Lt. Mohammed Khayoun said.
An American soldier was killed Monday when attackers fired on a U.S. patrol in northeastern Baghdad, the U.S. command said. Also Monday, a soldier died of wounds suffered in a blast in Diyala province and another soldier died in a traffic accident.
The deaths raised to at least 2,905 the number of members of the U.S. military who have died since the Iraq war started in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count.
___
AP writers Hamza Hendawi and Sameer N. Yacoub contributed to this report from Baghdad.
Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
printable version
-
Sponsored Links
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 143 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 143 guests)
24 Hour Gold
Advertising
- Over 20.000 UNIQUE Daily!
- Get Maximum Exposure For Your Site!
- Get QUALITY Converting Traffic!
- Advertise Here Today!
Out Of Billions Of Website's Online.
Members Are Online From.
- Get Maximum Exposure For Your Site!
- Get QUALITY Converting Traffic!
- Advertise Here Today!
Out Of Billions Of Website's Online.
Members Are Online From.