Thread: Pray for us. Thanks for your support.

I support your question, but I am afraid that they will not respond even so they very well know ISP address location.

秘密I 认为

I would be unspeakably cruel if someone posted on behalf of Bryan. So to clear up any doubt admin should authenticate the email and where it originated from. If there is nothing to hide, then ensuring the PIPS members would not be a problem? I am not surprised that many PIPS members want to how that the post actually did come from Bryan.
Please authenticate the email admin.
carolinem

I wouldn't hold your breath for an acceptable answer to this question carolinem. Me thinks there is another agenda here, maybe MODS just trying to drum up some traffic.

There is no reason they will not or can not give us all the information we seek.

They either know it's from BM and don't want to eat humble pie and say so, due to their much publicized position.

or someone got into the personal info of BM and used it, or they just flat out don't know.
Which begs other serious questions.

All those scenarios are unacceptable.

Let the truth prevail MAREK what was the ISP?

You MODS can squash all this speculative crap with one bit of info.....the ISP that the BM post came from. Wonder why you ain't forthcoming with it.

Originally Posted by carolinem

I would be unspeakably cruel if someone posted on behalf of Bryan. So to clear up any doubt admin should authenticate the email and where it originated from. If there is nothing to hide, then ensuring the PIPS members would not be a problem? I am not surprised that many PIPS members want to how that the post actually did come from Bryan.
Please authenticate the email admin.
carolinem

Marek was not monitoring the post as it came in and says he cant check the data out.Its to late.

Even if you had the ISP it would not prove anything.You have to assume that Bryan is out on bail to have posted at all.There appears to be no news on that front.

Originally Posted by whadyano

Marek/Yogi,

Did anyone run the IP address on this, like was done for "Barry",
to verify what country it was posted from?

A good pointer there and what d/ya know on this latest attempt among our members "with FREE access" that can worm there way in time & time again...

This resulted in many intrusions such as the postee had accomplished and one I suspect did it just to stir more despair with his/her crooked intentions to lure out the silent hopefuls...

By no means was this callous act supported by us nor pose as a statistical favor to our forum, on the contrary, it does prove the need to have membership alligned to a "future" stringent registration of members signing in when that process is due...

Right now, it is an open market with ALL sellers and Traders and Trollers spanned across your numerous ID's as well... We ARE AWARE of these, no secret about it but someday soon, it will end and with good measure once Marek introduce the new Investment strategy and launch.

So for now, that burning question which itself puked me all the same as you were....the IP addy, what about it... !!!

Even "Styles" managed to seep through the net occassionally with no IP detected...

However, as you are all currently signed in, no membership fees, unwilling to register your potential data, we CANNOT impose on you nor charge you on those flimsy details you submitted. The situation remains unchanged for the moment despite much were spent to improve the software bit and as most savvy netters among you realised, that is a shortlived upgrade but expenses remain just to upkeep and stay in the forefront with the ever demanding increase in accessibility which also opens up to maggots hanging around like parasites with ill-intentions.

I deplore it myself when I first read the first post of this thread however, the decision in NOT to delete it based on my judgement as well as from most of you that are pragmatic in your thinking capacity, and knows fully well, just when to see and make the distinction between a cynical laugh to a guffaw like this had shown to qualify.

To let it stay, was prudent to prove our objectivity and staying neutral on "free expression" but to deprive that silly and harmless rhetiric or claim by the contents found within, is simply not recommended either... it will "bury itself" by it's own deceitful exposure despite a wide and responsive feedback we saw thanking the anonymous postee disguised as Bryan Marsden.


None of our MODs incl. Admin/Marek has prior knowledge of this planned message and we are NOT in the least too bothered by the bad humor posted either by proxy or by a sicko individual however, I would suggest you treat it as a pinch of old salt that has long lost its grain & value to ever paying nout its worth....

YB. - cheers to all that will walk away from the 1st preposterous postee that submitted this thread.

YogiBrood said

To let it stay, was prudent to prove our objectivity and staying neutral on "free expression" but to deprive that silly and harmless rhetiric or claim by the contents found within, is simply not recommended either... it will "bury itself" by it's own deceitful exposure despite a wide and responsive feedback we saw thanking the anonymous postee disguised as Bryan Marsden.

That sums it up folk.

If the message does not originate from BM either directly or through someone else posting on his behalf, then I think it is quite possible that some entity wished to gauge the degree of support that may continue to exist for BM. If that is the case then I would imagine they must be somewhat shocked by the result!
Regardless, I’m sure that somehow Bryan and Sharon will get to see this outpouring of support and no doubt be fortified by it.

Originally Posted by Chester

If the message does not originate from BM either directly or through someone else posting on his behalf, then I think it is quite possible that some entity wished to gauge the degree of support that may continue to exist for BM. If that is the case then I would imagine they must be somewhat shocked by the result!
Regardless, I’m sure that somehow Bryan and Sharon will get to see this outpouring of support and no doubt be fortified by it.

For a cruel joke the result must have been 'dissapointingly' possitive. The core of BM's vision clearly still stands.

I can fully relate to the cautious assessment/assumption by Chester and have no reasons to discount such a possibility either.

However, if statistics are to be taken for a definition on support or as a degree of blind faith, I still wouldn't be perturbed by this outpouring of "thank you" gestures ommitted through our Forum.

Marek has informed all the listed members of RC and that itself is a fraction of the sizeable figure we all know exceeded the 100 to 200K to be fully optimistic then.

If ever a 15% margin (which is marginal and not significant to influence any fortified indications), was gauged, the current count thus far is by far, TOO LITTLE to be taken seriously.

In anycase,whatever and whoever thinks this is something worthy to gauge from...less it being a silly and ridiculous attempt and a silly joke... I have no qualms to the current result displayed.

It won't change the course of what is soon to be known for sure and that certainty will be acknowledged and confirmed by the Legal Court of Malaysia and as far as I can see where the remaining bucks are left for dispersion to all concern, it is wishful thinking since the last Convention held in its name.


YB. - cheers nonetheless and we will soon notice the anxious drop & slide in response once the majority realises, they've been had once again by a jerk acting on BM's behalf!!!

good luck bryan and sharon. from popsicle