Please visit our sponsors

Rolclub does not endorse ads. Please see our disclaimer.
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25
  1. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    42
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wacky
    Bullshit!

    I just think that some stuff one reads about manifestation is just alot of sensationalism. You know! Sex being the titilating subject it is, together with the claim that one can attract anything easily & effortlessly... there is no doubt that such a claim about sex would someday be concocted by someone and accepted by many. See... everyone is just excited by the idea of having sexual pleasure and also by attracting anything through manifestation (as many people mistakenly think manifestation means attaining things without doing a hitch of work).

    I am in no way dismissing the idea, as from my experience manifestation powers exist. But I think just reaching an orgasm doesn't just put you in connection with the universe/multiverse or whatever. If someone is just having sex for the fulfilment of lustfull intentions and without the ingredient of love then that's something that severly limits one's connetion with the field of all possibilities IMO.

    Having looked into many religions I am in no way a commited christian but having had a Catholic upbringing I can assure you that what you say there about the Vatican's idea of sex is totally incorrect. Whoever thaught you that nonsense about the Catholic church is a completely misinformed individual trying to find sensational arguments. Just like Eric Von Daniken used to do to 'prove' that primitive cultures were visited by extra-terrestrial astronauts.

    What the church suggests is that sex is only practiced between a man and a woman who are commited in marridge, and that it should be open for life (that is against artificial contraception... which is the point I personally disagree with mostly) & that sex should also be used so that a couple shares love. The church (at least these days) doesn't say sex is filthy (it is even encouraged between a man and woman that love each other) or anything of what you said.

    There has never been a religion in history that says that sex is filthy! The nearest exception are some Hare Krishna cults, where a married couple must meditate to achieve purity of soul before intercourse. But that's not because sex is filthy according to their belief, it's because one's intention with sex may be satisfaction of the ego rather than a means of sharing love.

    The religion that mostly encouraged sex as a reproductive means was Islam especially during the times of the Holy wars where they simply wanted increase in the Islamic population more soldiers to be 'produced'. Islam however never condemed sex as filthy. In fact a man is allowed by Islam to own 3 female companions.

    The idea of sex being held in a married couple was (and still is) popular in Judaism cultures out of which all Monotheist (one God) religions came, but again, the Jews never thought of sex as being filthy. THe one-partner idea was not a religious belief at all. The Jews had a culture with alot of hygenic attitudes, to the extent that one shouldn't even touch a woman in days she is menstruating.

    Which just makes me conclude that anything you read about any church (least the Vatican) condemning sex as part of a conspiracy and because of it's hidden manifestation powers is just alot of irresponsible nonsense... it's just sensetionalism some are ready to believe.

    Contrary to some claims about this subject, there was once an extensive study about 20 ancient cultures. This studied showed that when a culture with conservative sexual attitudes became more liberal it soon started to perish. The conclusions where that in human society sexual restrictions are a necessity for the survival of the species.

    I know that life can seem boring at times, but I suggest it would be wise to use rational judgement when reading about something so sensational.

    i agree and dissagree with you here.
    long ago the catholic church did say that sex for anything besides having kids was wrong. But it wasnt to hide some supernatural power that could be discovered. It was for 2 reasons. One reason was because the roman empire needed more population growth and two at that time you had to goto church to confess your sins and you had to *pay* a tribute when you goto church. Being that people had sex for enjoyment all the time, the church made plenty money threw the influx of ppl comming in to confess thier "many" sins and offer tribute to the church and an supposed increase in population as ppl wasnt going to deprive themselves of sex but wanted to follow the churches laws.

    more population + more revenue = stronger nation
    Last edited by lapcus; 12-02-2006 at 01:05 AM.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    212
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by robonz
    Hi.

    The Sex Urge is the Most Powerful!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Period/Ditto etc. etc.

    Just think about it.

    Everything goes out the Window.
    Isn't it part of the instinct of survival of the species, inherent in all life, whether or not it actually survives.

    The person who said that a way to a man's heart is through his stomach aimed a little high.

  3. #23
    Investor karinc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    397
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 215 Times in 41 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by denim
    Somehow I don't think "yes - O yes - pips - pips - oh pips pips - yes pips - i'm pipping - pips you can do it baby" does it for me.
    Hihi, this reminded me of when PIPS was born...because I thought there should be a better name for it since everybody said "happy pipping" and the like... and a slangword (is "slang" English? ) for "having sex" in Swedish is "pippa". So in "Swenglish" that would be "pipping"...so when I read "pipping" I subconciously read "fuXXXing"...
    /K

  4. #24
    Rolclub's Forex Moderator Wacky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    The empty space between thoughts
    Posts
    369
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by karinc
    Hihi, this reminded me of when PIPS was born...because I thought there should be a better name for it since everybody said "happy pipping" and the like... and a slangword (is "slang" English? ) for "having sex" in Swedish is "pippa". So in "Swenglish" that would be "pipping"...so when I read "pipping" I subconciously read "fuXXXing"...
    /K
    thanks so much for the precious info... Now I can subconscoiusly give some Swedish girl subliminal messages that would have them exchange some really sweet cuddles with this handsome 27 year old, mediteranean guy

    Did you know that the central point of an apple is called the pippin? I mean, why pippin? It makes you think of some intricate & misterious piping system in full activity! Why not call it an apple's nipple, apple's cockyx, the spot or pussy considering it's location? Pippin just doesn't sound that exciting to me?

  5. #25
    Co-Admin YogiBrood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Occasionally somewhere but NOT just anywhere...
    Posts
    5,881
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks
    1,658
    Thanked 1,935 Times in 650 Posts

    Default


    Any new topic, unrelated to the PIPs & Bryan Marsden trial will have to be created & posted in the correct Forum in ROLClub.

    I am closing this thread and all that are related to the Marsdens/PIPS/Hallotto disguise deceit. For returning members wanting to trace or track related posts concerning the current development some call it a stupid saga, a farce and even a silly & endless waste of time, well whatever anyone feels opinionated by their individual viewpoints or argument, the Trial on the Marsdens is NOT over and far from closure hence, a main sticky thread will cater to that attention

    at this link>>>:

    Any further new threads open just for the sake of an individual's ignorance to the progress surrounding the Marsdens or the Trial or anything else on PIPS or PicPay and all the parties involved will find their newly created thread deleted. Issues related to the past and further back in the past, will be posted in the above thread, click that and stay there with your submitted posts please. This is a start of some pruning and spring cleaning on the PIPS related Forum.

  6. Sponsored Links
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Share |